Just a little reminder that the unelected
North East Assembly still exists. The piece below was written about
eighteen months ago. It is not acceptable to have the unelected bodies
continuing to spend public money when the public have rejected the idea
of elected bodies.
The
North East Assembly needs to disband and the association of North East
Councils handed back any control and powers. The monumental wave of
public opinion that delivered a serious political message will be a
monumental wave of anger should they believe they have been well and
truly shafted and deceived. Woe betied any councillor or local authority
that continues to support this body. We will name and shame and ensure
that they pay a very heavy political price at the next elections.
-----------------------------------------
The 'Barber of
S'EVIL
www.neilherron.co.uk
The comic opera
continues in the North East with the Director, Stephen Barber of the
North East Assembly again making the headlines, but unfortunately, this
time the audience is not laughing. There is no Figaro, just a complicated
trail that everyone is trying to ' Figarout,' and the amount of money
that is involved in this case, is slightly more than a tenor!The first
'gross distortion' was the fact that the North East Assembly denied
that they had misused public money in campaigning for and promoting
elected regional government. A complaint was made to the District Auditor
who censured the Assembly publicly and they were forced to adopt a neutral
stance. The Director gave reassurances to all the subscribing local
authorities that he would not step over the line again, as it is the
authorities that would have to face, and bear the costs of any legal
action. The Chairman of the Assembly quietly resigned at the AGM 'a
la Milburnesque', to,'spend more time with family.
The 'second 'lie'
manifested itself just the other day and is the start of another duplicitous
trail involving more misuse of public money, the self-generating proliferation
of bureaucracy disconnected from any accountability by any elected structures
and the link into the European Union and its wish to ultimately create
a 'Europe of the Regions' with the neutering of the nation state.
As I have previously
mentioned, John Prescott has always had a dream that the United Kingdom
be divided into twelve regions. (My dreams tend to involve scoring hat
tricks in cup finals, hero worship and beautiful women, and winning
the lottery, but there must be something wrong with me. Reminds me of
the waiter who brought two bottles of champagne to George Best's hotel
room. George had had a drink and was lying on the bed with Miss World
and surrounded by tens of thousands of pounds from winning at the Casino
earlier in the evening. The waiter said, "Mr. Best, where did it all
go wrong?")
Back to Prescott's
dream. It has always been strenuously denied that there is any connection
between the Deputy Pie Minister's vision of the nation's future governance
and the European Union's blueprint for a 'Europe of the Regions,' which
is a bit like ignoring the elephant in the room. Ongoing research threw
up a connection between the shadowy English Regions Network and the
European Commission in London, but there were strenuous denials that
there had ever been any meetings between the two.Sad as I've become,
last Friday night I was trawling through minutes of little ERN's meetings
when I found a little golden nugget. The significance of ERN is that
it is the body whose remit is to co-ordinate the political strategy
of the eight English regions outside London, as they move towards having
elected regional assemblies.
The plot thickens
as this body appears to have no democratic accountability at all. The
problem for Mr. Barber is that the North East Assembly is now the Secretariat
of ERN as it operates on a rotating basis. The lead Assembly is responsible
for the administrative costs. The ratepayers of the subscribing councils
will therefore bear the cost.
So, yet again we
are back to square one with my money going to an organisation to attempt
to create regional government without my consent, and I am one of many
who ain't gonna put up with that.
The golden nugget
that I found was the agenda and minutes for a meeting held in the Commission's
office on 15 November 2001. This began with lunch given to senior ERN
officials by Commission officials, headed by Geoffrey Martin, then the
Commission's top man in the UK, followed by a meeting in the Commission
conference room until 4pm. It was recorded that ERN had 'agreed an invitation
from the EU Commission UK office to hold further meetings at that venue'.
Last week the same question was put to the ERN itself, whose affairs,
as mentioned,are currently being managed by the North East Regional
Assembly, Stephen Barber (former Head of European Operations for Kent
County Council). He replied that ERN is seeking a meeting with the EU's
regional commissioner Michel Barnier, but he would have to check with
other regional assemblies 'what the position is on any previous meetings'.
Yet Mr Barber was recorded in the minutes as one of those present in
2001, and he also delivered an address. It seems that he may have selective
amnesia which may also be contagious.
The former Chairman
of the Assembly, Tony Flynn, who is also Leader of Newcastle Council
(he has more positions than the hardback version of the Kama Sutra.
Makes you wonder where they actually get time to listen to the electorate)
also seems to have ERNnesia. He forgot to declare last year in his Council's
register of Member's Interests that he was Deputy Chairman of ERN. Just
an oversight of course!
So how deep does
this rabbit hole go? How many lies and half-truths have been told to
get the gravy train to its current station? How many more connections
need to be made before this completely manipulated sham is exposed?
Is it any surprise
that ConnectPA, the public affairs consultants who 'advise' ERN is filled
with former New Labour advisors who have worked for Patricia Hewitt,
Stephen Byers and David Blunkett? Mr. Barber has given an undertaking
to all the North East Councils that the North East Assembly will 'insure
and indemnify' council members and officials from all costs in relation
to any attempted legal action.The indemnity cannot be provided with
North East Assembly money as that money belongs to the councils who
received it from their ratepayers. You could hardly use ratepayers money
to cover court costs in an action brought by ratepayers. That would
be a bit like a burglar being found guilty and asking to burgle another
house to pay his costs.We wait with bated breath for sight of this insurance
policy, and hope it is not underwritten by Hoodwink, Fleeceham and Scarper.
I do believe that the noise I can hear from my office window is that
of seagulls and not that of a cock crowing before the third denial...but
I cannot be sure.As the Government lurches from one crisis to another
and the Deputy Prime Minister is left in charge of the country one wonders
how this opera will end. As we know it will not be over until the fat
lady sings. Perish the thought of Prescott in drag.